Laws, Regulations and Annotations
Business Taxes Law Guide – Revision 2022
Sales and Use Tax Memorandum Opinions
Leonard Eugene Perry
The Memorandum Opinion of Leonard Eugene Perry dated May 13, 1999 holds that three products used as lagoon innoculants, called M.S. 2.5, LG 54 XTRA and M.S. 2.2, are exempted from tax pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 6358(d) because they are a "fertilizer" to be applied to land the products of which are to be used as food for human consumption. The three products each meet the definition of "commercial fertilizer" as defined in the Food and Agriculture Code section 14522 as each product contains 5 percent or more of nitrogen, available phosphoric acid, or soluble potash, singly or collectively.
BEFORE THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Petition for Redetermination under the Sales and Use Tax Law of LEONARD EUGENE PERRY
|Mr. Leonard Perry
Mr. Kevin Kelley
For Appeals Section:
|Ms. Susan Wengel
Senior Tax Counsel
For Sales and Use Tax Department:
|Ms. Janice Thurston
Senior Tax Counsel
This opinion considers the merits of a petition for redetermination in the amount of $4,886.87 in tax for the period January 1, 1993 through June 30, 1996. The Board heard this matter on March 17, 1999, in Sacramento, California.
Petitioner is a sole proprietor engaged in the business of supplying biological products and services to the dairy industry. In providing these products and services, petitioner purchased lagoon innoculants from an out-of-state vendor. These innoculants, more specifically three products called M.S. 2.5, LG 54 XTRA and M.S. 2.2, are substances used to break down solids and improve the fertilizer quality of manure. The innoculants are applied to manure wastewater held by dairy farmers in lagoons. After treatment the wastewater is drained off and used to irrigate fields. The solid matter at the bottom of the lagoon is dried and used by the dairy farmers as fertilizer on their fields.
The Sales and Use Tax Department (Department) concluded that petitioner was liable for use tax with respect to the lagoon innoculants that he applied to the dairy farmers' lagoons as part of his service business. The Department further concluded that whenever the lagoon innoculants were sold directly to the dairy farmers, the sale was subject to sales tax. It was the Department's position that the lagoon innoculants were purchased primarily as a catalyst to improve the quality of the cow manure as a fertilizer.
Petitioner contends that the written testimony of Thomas T. Yamashita, who has a Ph.D. in Plant Pathology from the University of California, Davis, supports the position that all three products are commercial fertilizers.
Revenue and Taxation Code section 6358(d) provides that there are exempted from the taxes imposed by this part, the gross receipts from the sale in this state of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of fertilizer to be applied to land the products of which are to be used as food from human consumption. The California Code of Regulations, title 18, section 1588(b) provides the definition of the term "fertilizer." This definition includes commercial fertilizers which are further defined in the Food and Agriculture Code section 14522. This statute provides that "commercial fertilizer" means any substance which contains 5 percent or more of nitrogen, available phosphoric acid, or soluble potash, singly or collectively, which is distributed in this state for promoting or stimulating plant growth.
Based on the written testimony of Thomas T. Yamashita, we conclude that M.S. 2.5, LG 54 XTRA and M.S. 2.2 by virtue of 5.5 percent levels of the essential elements, meet the definition of commercial fertilizer as set out in the Food and Agricultural Code. The petition is granted.
Done at Sacramento, California, this 13th day of May, 1999.
Johan Klehs, Chairman
Dean F. Andal, Member
Claude Parrish, Member
John Chiang, Member
Kathleen Connell, Member